Dear Annie: My wife left me a little over a year ago. She handled all the finances and was a stay-at-home mom while I worked to earn money. After six months of counseling and her refusing to budge, it was evident the marriage was. She says it was spent on groceries, gas, gifts and other living expenses, while stteal family checking account shows those expenses were drawn from it. Is this plausible? Or does some malfeasance seem probable? Dear Baffled: Good riddance.
A woman whose marriage broke down more than 30 years ago has won the right to seek payments from her ex-husband, a one-time new age traveller who became a multimillionaire businessman. Kathleen Wyatt has been granted permission by the supreme court to lodge a belated claim against Dale Vince, who founded and runs the green energy company Ecotricity. Vince, 53, lives in a Georgian hill fort in Gloucestershire with his second wife. The couple met in , when she was 21 and he was 19, and married later that year. Wyatt already had a child from an earlier relationship who was accepted as part of the family. They subsisted on state benefits. After moving to Norfolk, where their son was born in , they parted. Vince began travelling, initially in an old ambulance converted into a camper van. He later drove to Spain with a new partner in a year-old fire engine. Vince and Wyatt were formally divorced in She subsequently had two more children from a later relationship.
Trending News
By , with the help of a bank loan, he had set up a wind turbine on top of a hill at Nympsfield, in the Costswolds, and started generating what became a substantial income. It is a dangerous fallacy Wyatt will now have to return to the high court to pursue her claim. We have always believed that our client has a strong case, and we welcome the clarity of this decision. This could signal open season for people who had brief relationships a quarter of a century ago Otherwise it could lead to future claims to a share of the wealth earned after the divorce. Facebook Twitter Pinterest.
What is alimony?
Women’s work is uncompensated and undervalued. When women become stay-at-home mothers, that benefits men’s careers, and when the marriage ends, she should be compensated for that lost earning potential. Both partners’ lifestyles should be the same when the marriage ends! He had a high-earning career, and after spending her 20s in low-paid retail jobs, his wife stayed home full-time until the kids were in high school, then worked part-time retail, tried to start a couple of craft businesses that went nowhere, and then started sleeping with her massage therapist. When they divorced, this couple stayed on mostly friendly terms and would get together with the kids, who were by then in college. His career continued on while she struggled bitterly. Since they broke up in the middle of the housing and stock market bust, there weren’t many assets to divide. The kids were out of the house, so there was no child support. When they split, he had been laid off and was unemployed, so there was no alimony. She went from a very comfortable life as a suburban housewife, to struggling very hard to get by, living in a shared apartment. At the time, I was incredulous about this.
More in News
By Liz Hodgkinson. Women have fought for equality, and many battles have been won, but divorcing women are still making out they are pathetic little Fifties housewives. She got it on our divorce. He had been banished to a dingy rented flat, he told me. Far from being an unlucky, isolated example, my friend is one of the growing number of men who find themselves losing everything through divorce. And often, they go on getting everything for years, long after time has been called on their marriage. In these days of equal education, opportunities and access to professions, women are still humiliating themselves by expecting and receiving huge and continuing settlements when a marriage ends. What on earth is wrong with earning your own living and standing on your own two feet? If modern marriage is an equal partnership, divorce should be the same, surely, with both parties getting out what they have put in, as when any other type of contract ends. Yet modern women are still positioning themselves as the weaker vessel having to be kept by a big strong man, whether married or divorced. We have fought for equality, and many battles have been won, but divorcing women are still making out they are pathetic little Fifties housewives unable to fend for themselves, before ruthlessly fleecing the men they once professed to love. The compilers of the list said that if you are an attractive woman, possibly your best guarantee of a huge income is to marry a super-rich man and then divorce him a few years later.
She has a disability. Lady T. You are cheating on him too. Many people dont believe, strangers dont believe.
The many ways that alimony holds women back (alimony arguments debunked)
A woman whose marriage broke down more than 30 years ago has won the right to seek payments from her ex-husband, a one-time new age traveller who became a multimillionaire businessman. Kathleen Wyatt has been granted permission by the supreme court to lodge a belated claim against Dale Vince, who founded and runs the green energy company Ecotricity.
Vince, 53, lives in a Georgian hill fort in Gloucestershire with his second wife. The couple met inwhen she yhey 21 and he was 19, and married later that year. Wyatt already had a child from an earlier relationship who was accepted as part of the family. They subsisted on state benefits. After moving to Norfolk, where their son was born inthey parted. Vince began travelling, initially in an old ambulance converted into a camper van. He later theu to Spain with a new partner in a year-old fire engine.
Vince and Wyatt were formally divorced in She subsequently had two more children from a later relationship. Bywith the help of a bank loan, he had set up a wind turbine on top of a hill at Nympsfield, in the Costswolds, and started generating what became a substantial income.
It is a dangerous fallacy Wyatt will now have to return to the high court to pursue her claim. We have always believed that our client has a strong case, and we welcome the clarity of this decision. This could signal open season for people who had brief relationships a quarter of a century ago Otherwise it could lead to future claims to a share of the wealth earned after the divorce. Facebook Twitter Pinterest. Topics Family law. Relationships Divorce news.
Reuse this content. Order by newest yhey recommendations. Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Most popular.
How to Steal Your Ex From Their New Boyfriend or Girlfriend (Sneaky Tricks Revealed)
Lisk Feng for BuzzFeed News. Maybe revisiting the place would be romantic. When she wanted to get a pedicure, he criticized her one indulgence as a waste of money. Months later, she asked for a divorce and began planning to transfer from community college to a four-year womem.
ADVERTISEMENT
Her soon-to-be ex-husband Dan had opened at least five in her name sincejust a year into their marriage. She later thought back to that Vegas trip. It felt as if he was caring for. Dan was 11 years older and, she thought, better with numbers than she. She now thinks it was a way to make sure she never saw the bills. Much of the institutional response to intimate partner abuse has focused on women experiencing physical violence. Financial abuse has rarely been a consideration, despite the fact that money itself is often a tool of abusers.
Comments
Post a Comment