The year-old social media star built a career off the now-defunct Vine app and later, off of two simultaneous YouTube channels. His Midwestern good looks, slapstick humor, and intricately planned and executed viral videos have earned him millions of dollars and legions of diehard fans. But Paul has become embroiled in multiple controversies in the last two years, costing him advertising on YouTube and a movie deal with YouTube Red. Here’s how Paul went from a year-old making homemade videos in his backyard in Ohio to one of the most famous — and controversial — social media stars in the world:. Source: Insider. The Vine app is obsolete now, but Paul’s channel still exists online. Source: Forbes. Source: Business Insider. Source: DeadlineInsider.
The Morning After: Disney+ will debut early in Europe
Logan Paul is back on YouTube in typically repulsive fashion — but it appears that the streaming service is not amused. But in his return video , many argued he struck the wrong note, seemingly bragging about his accomplishments while also playing the victim. He has also posted provocative videos from his trip to Japan and encouraged his viewers to take part in the lethal Tide Pod challenge in a now-deleted Tweet. In a statement , YouTube told Mashable that monetizing videos in which Paul tasers a dead rat and takes a fish out of a pond to give it CPR ugh violate its advertising standards:. This is not a decision we made lightly, however, we believe he has exhibited a pattern of behavior in his videos that makes his channel not only unsuitable for advertisers but also potentially damaging to the broader creator community. It’s not the first time YouTube has tried to control Paul’s antics by cutting off cash. On January 10 , they removed Logan Paul’s channel from its preferred ad platform and cancelled a YouTube Red show he was starring in. Then, five days later, YouTube rolled out new advertiser guidelines and put a new emphasis on human moderators in order to prevent creators from making money on videos that include hate speech, child exploitation, and other videos they deem questionable. Friday’s decision to cut Paul’s videos off from ad revenue seems to be evidence of this new policy in action, with a public slap on the wrist for good measure.
Apple reportedly dropped iCloud encryption plans amid FBI pressure
Of course, that won’t stop Logan Paul from making money from his merchandise, which he consistently peddles on his channel amongst his tasteful jokes — and which he’ll probably pushing harder than ever:. Anyway, I would watch for Logan to push his merch even harder in his vids now if that’s even possible?!? Both Paul bros are merch machines, their vids are really just vehicles to sell merch. It’s their 2nd biggest rev stream huge portion of their income that YT can’t take away. We’re using cookies to improve your experience. Click Here to find out more. Tech Like Follow.
Sonos will stop updating its ‘legacy’ products in May
A fearful realisation, but it appears that, in Logan Paul , the world may be in the presence of a genius. Is that genius good or evil? I have yet to decide. Logan Paul has yet to decide. We will only know one way or another when he explodes the moon as some sort of viral prank. You are not supposed to do that, it turns out. YouTube cut ties with him , Paul lost thousands of subscribers and commercial partners, and went to ground for a month before coming back with an apology video. Thirteen-year-olds, as they always do, smile knowingly in the background. Logan Paul was just on Fox Business and, well, it was something pic.
One year ago today, YouTube star Logan Paul was facing a heavy storm of criticism for a video he posted on his popular channel. In it, he and his friends were seen walking into Japan’s Aokigahara forest — an area well-known for being a place many go to end their lives — and coming across a body. Paul showed the body in the video, only blurring the deceased’s face, and he and his friends proceeded to laugh and make jokes about the situation in the recording. The backlash began almost immediately, with many, including fellow YouTubers, speaking out against the video, how Paul behaved in it and the intent behind it. While Paul claimed he and his friends were there to document the «haunted aspect of the forest,» critics pointed out that with the forest’s reputation, it seemed highly unlikely that Paul and his entourage weren’t aware of what they might find. It also seemed quite plausible that they went there in search of it to begin with. As criticism mounted, Paul released an apology, first in a tweet and then in a video. And he claimed he didn’t post the video for the views. YouTube faced calls for change as well, with YouTuber Laci Green calling it «a sociopathic garbage fire» and others saying the company had a responsibility to prevent videos like that from ever being published.
Don’t miss out on the next big story.
Many of its top stars have been in hot water recently: From PewDiePie making racists remarks, to a «family» channel with abusive kid pranks , the company’s been under fire for not keeping a closer eye on the type of content that makes it onto the site. But it simultaneously treats enormously popular creators like Paul differently, because they command such massive audiences. But YouTube had to make an example out of him in order to appease advertisers, which grow more and more concerned that their ads could appear alongside disturbing or inappropriate videos. The longer the viewers watch their videos, the more money they earn. On it, YouTube could theoretically disclose what team screened a video and when. The main challenge for YouTube is that often it is top users who are uploading dubious content , not the smaller channels. Just as it plans to do going forward.
But blaming the YouTube star alone seems insufficient. This one gets an average of 1. What Google and YouTube hope, naturally, is that this will help avoid makin mess like the one Logan Paul created. He believes that, by censoring its creators, the site makingg lose the freedom that’s made it the most popular video site in the world. It’s not as if YouTube hasn’t dealt with cases similar to Logan Paul’s in the past. YouTube encourages stars like Paul to garner views by any means necessary, while largely deciding how and when to censor their videos behind closed doors. If the new system would’ve been in place, chances are the controversial Logan Paul video may have never been viewed by the masses and, therefore, YouTube stkll saved itself from major public outcry. But those guidelines only consists of a few short sentences, making it impossible to know. With the makinf YouTube Partner Programfor example, some creators aren’t happy with the new requirements because they don’t think they’ll be able to make money. But it simultaneously treats enormously popular creators like Paul differently, because they command such massive audiences.
His over 15 million mostly underage subscribers like this sort of comedic aloofness—it serves to make Paul more relatable. Within a day, over 6. YouTube encourages stars like Paul to garner views by any means necessary, while largely deciding how and when to censor their videos behind closed doors.
On January 10, over a week after Paul uploaded the video, YouTube announced it had removed the star from Google Preferred, its top-tier advertising program that allows creators to have access to revenue from premium advertisers.
The platform is also delaying projects Paul was a part of for its subscription streaming service YouTube Red.
His video was disturbing and offensive to the victim, their family, and to those who have struggled with mental illness. But blaming the YouTube star alone seems insufficient. Both he, and his equally famous brother Jake Paul, earn their living from YouTube, a platform that rewards creators for being outrageous, and often fails to adequately police its own content.
Roberts, an assistant professor of information studies at UCLA and an expert in internet culture and content moderation. According to SocialBladean analytics company that tracks the estimated revenue of YouTube channels, Paul could make as much as 14 million dollars per year. While YouTube might not explicitly encourage Paul to pull ever-more insane stunts, it stands to benefit financially when he and creators like him gain millions of views off of outlandish episodes.
YouTube presents its platform as democratic; anyone can upload and contribute to it. But it simultaneously treats enormously popular creators like Paul differently, because they command such massive audiences. Last year, the company even chose Paul to star in The Thinningthe first full-length thriller distributed via its streaming subscription service YouTube Red, as well as Foursomea romantic comedy series also offered via the service.
For example, major YouTube creators I have spoken to in the past said they often work with a representative from the company who helps them navigate the platform, a luxury not afforded to the average person posting cat videos. YouTube prohibits violent or gory content posted in a shocking, sensational or disrespectful manner.
But those guidelines only consists of a few short sentences, making it impossible to know. Part of the problem is the vagueness. What might constitute a meaningful step toward transparency would be for YouTube to implement a moderation or edit log, says Lingel.
On it, YouTube could theoretically disclose what team screened a video and. If the moderators choose to remove or age-restrict a video, the log could disclose what community standard violation resulted in that decision.
Fundamentally, Lingel says, we need to rethink how we envision content moderation. The task is sometimes even left to an AI, that quietly combs through videos looking for inappropriate content or ISIS recruiting videos.
At the time this story went live, it already had nearly two million views. If you or someone you know is considering suicide, help is available. You can call to speak with someone at the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline 24 hours a day in the United States. All Things in Moderation. She is based in New York. Staff Writer Twitter. Featured Video. Topics YouTube content moderation.
Paul, 22, apologized Tuesday after receiving widespread condemnation for sharing footage of an apparent suicide victim in Aokigahara forest. Though he demonetized and later removed the video, it had already been viewed some 6. He usually averages around 3 million views per day. The YouTuber —who first rose to stardom on defunct video-sharing website Vine—has His apology video Tuesday, which is also demonetized, meaning he won’t earn any income from it, has gained 14 million views in one day. In a statement Tuesday, YouTube said it «prohibits violent or gory content posted in a shocking, sensational or disrespectful manner.
SteelSeries’ price-friendly gaming peripherals are made for everyone
If a video is graphic, it can only remain on the site when supported by appropriate educational or documentary information youtybe in some cases it will be age-gated. In his apology, Paul said sorry to «the internet» and «most importantly, youtbe victim and his family. The YouTuber added he never wants his video content «to be heartless, cruel or malicious. I made a huge mistake. I don’t expect to be forgiven. I’m just here to apologize. I’m disappointed in. I promise to be better. I will be better,» he concluded. Weekly magazine, delivered Daily Newsletter Website access.
Comments
Post a Comment